Sharon
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 2,563 
|
Post by Sharon on Jun 23, 2023 0:17:58 GMT
Coxford result:
Anthony Adhikary Reform 118
David Chapman LD 234
Vikkie Cheng Con 712
Joanne Clements Green 130
Declan Clune TUSC 25
Philip Crook Reform 121
Ken Darke LD 157
John Edwards Reform 130
Maggie Fricker TUSC 35
Diana Galton Con 806
Peter Galton LD 228
Ali Haydor TUSC 15
Rebecca McCreanor Lab 930
Ron Meldrum Green 104
Paul Nolan Con 774
Ash Phillips Green 111
Matt Renyard Lab 1,022
Rebecca Ruddick Lab 880
Ed Surridge Ind 47
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jun 23, 2023 6:20:07 GMT
Using top vote in Southampton, ( with changes from 2022, that’s)
LAB 42.5% (-2.6)
Con 33.5% (-8.7)
LD 9.7% (+3.4)
Green 5.4% (+0.3)
RefUK 5.4% (new)
Ind 2% (new)
TUSC 1.5% (+0.2)
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 23, 2023 6:20:30 GMT
Tavistock came close to a 4-way draw- even the Tory (poor 4th place) was actually only 67 votes behind the winner!
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jun 23, 2023 6:22:20 GMT
Lab 69.95% Con 17.71% Grn 6.87% LD 5.47% Top vote method What was the comparison compared to last time Lab +17.2% Con +6.3% Green new LD -1.7% No Ind or UKIP from last time |
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jun 23, 2023 6:25:13 GMT
Tavistock changes from May
Ind ( obviously a different Indy) -7.6%
LD -2.2%
Green -1.7%
Con +5.8%
Lab - new
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 23, 2023 6:26:18 GMT
For once all the contests were being counted on the night, but we still seem to be awaiting the results from Hartburn and Warren?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jun 23, 2023 6:34:04 GMT
Wyre Warren
Maureen Blair Lab 552
Brian Stephenson Lab 503
John Fitzgerald Con 311
David Meekins Con 307
Turnout 26.5%
|
|
|
|
Post by froome on Jun 23, 2023 7:11:16 GMT
What was the comparison compared to last time Lab +17.2% Con +6.3% Green new LD -1.7% No Ind or UKIP from last time I did wonder whether the Lib Dems would make a bit of effort into denying Labour’s majority. I think I know the answer to that now. 😁 |
|
Sharon
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 2,563
|
Post by Sharon on Jun 23, 2023 7:13:30 GMT
Stockton-on-Tees, from their website:
COOMBS, Christopher
Labour Party
771
ELLIOTT, Andrew Michael
Reform UK
264
FRENCH, Jason John
The Conservative Party Candidate
1574 (elected)
HALL, Lynn Elizabeth
The Conservative Party Candidate
1788 (elected)
HOBSON, Jessica commonly known as HOBSON, Jess
Green Party candidate
342
INNES, Niall Bell
The Conservative Party Candidate
1773 (elected)
JORDAN, Jason Walter
Green Party candidate
131
SINGH, Kiran
Green Party candidate
134
STEPHENSON, Andrew Frederick
Reform UK
169
TYLER, Joanna Louise
Labour Party
681
There were 5 rejected ballot papers. The electorate consisted of 6930 people. Turnout was 40.15%.
|
|
mkc
Non-Aligned
Posts: 13
|
Post by mkc on Jun 23, 2023 7:14:00 GMT
Stockton on Tees , Hartburn
3 Conservatives elected
Hall C 1788
Innes C 1773
French C 1574
Coombs L 771
Tyler L 681
Hobson G 342
Elliot R 264
Stephenson R 169
Singh G 134
Jordan G 131
|
|
carlton43
Reform Party
Posts: 50,886 
Member is Online
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 23, 2023 7:31:45 GMT
Tavistock came close to a 4-way draw- even the Tory (poor 4th place) was actually only 67 votes behind the winner! Then it quite obviously was not a POOR 4th place though you may contend that it is 'poor' to have come 4th? It is the LDs that so often get a real poor 4th pace with a derisory vote. You should know about these things being in Ashford! |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jun 23, 2023 8:46:37 GMT
Tavistock came close to a 4-way draw- even the Tory (poor 4th place) was actually only 67 votes behind the winner! Then it quite obviously was not a POOR 4th place though you may contend that it is 'poor' to have come 4th? It is the LDs that so often get a real poor 4th pace with a derisory vote. You should know about these things being in Ashford! was about to say. If you nearly win it's not all that poor. Bit like England in the Test match  |
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 23, 2023 8:52:20 GMT
Tavistock came close to a 4-way draw- even the Tory (poor 4th place) was actually only 67 votes behind the winner! Then it quite obviously was not a POOR 4th place though you may contend that it is 'poor' to have come 4th? It is the LDs that so often get a real poor 4th pace with a derisory vote. You should know about these things being in Ashford! Perhaps my point eluded you (too subtle?)- maybe I needed inverted commas around the "poor" but I thought the rest of the comment made that clear. All parties have places where they actually trail a long way behind the leaders. Just as well or this whole psephology game would be extremely boring. There are a lot fewer cases these days where that is the Lib Dems, and a lot more where it is the Tories. And given that you claim ( at times) to have abandoned the Tories in favour of more right wing alternatives, you might look at where those come, if they bother to put up candidates at all. |
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
|
Post by The Bishop on Jun 23, 2023 9:26:20 GMT
That was a very good effort by the Greens in Tavistock considering the circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Post by evergreenadam on Jun 23, 2023 9:47:13 GMT
Stockton on Tees , Hartburn 3 Conservatives elected Hall C 1788 Innes C 1773 French C 1574 Coombs L 771 Tyler L 681 Hobson G 342 Elliot R 264 Stephenson R 169 Singh G 134 Jordan G 131 High turnout and pretty strong Tory result. |
|
carlton43
Reform Party
Posts: 50,886
Member is Online
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 23, 2023 9:49:10 GMT
Then it quite obviously was not a POOR 4th place though you may contend that it is 'poor' to have come 4th? It is the LDs that so often get a real poor 4th pace with a derisory vote. You should know about these things being in Ashford! Perhaps my point eluded you (too subtle?)- maybe I needed inverted commas around the "poor" but I thought the rest of the comment made that clear. All parties have places where they actually trail a long way behind the leaders. Just as well or this whole psephology game would be extremely boring. There are a lot fewer cases these days where that is the Lib Dems, and a lot more where it is the Tories. And given that you claim ( at times) to have abandoned the Tories in favour of more right wing alternatives, you might look at where those come, if they bother to put up candidates at all. Oh! I feel your pain. Soft spot was it? Yes! I don't do subtle and I am known for missing nuances and yesterday for 'entirely missing the point'. Yes. That is me. I grieve over it on the long winter nights. It comes with an absence of poetry, being so ill-read, having seen so few films, having no acquantaince with opera or fine music and knowing so very little about English or politics. I am rather deprived. You ought to feel sorry for me. |
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
|
Post by The Bishop on Jun 23, 2023 9:55:29 GMT
The countermanded polls can be seen as the conclusion of the 2023 local elections (and thus also the last electoral business from the May era)
Scores on the doors for them compared with 2019 (I am assuming W Lancs was "notionally" 3 OWL going into these elections) are LibDems up 3, Labour up 2, Tories down 4 and UKIP down 1. For "final" totals of Lab +539 LibDems +410 Con -1067 and UKIP -26 overall.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 23, 2023 9:57:29 GMT
Perhaps my point eluded you (too subtle?)- maybe I needed inverted commas around the "poor" but I thought the rest of the comment made that clear. All parties have places where they actually trail a long way behind the leaders. Just as well or this whole psephology game would be extremely boring. There are a lot fewer cases these days where that is the Lib Dems, and a lot more where it is the Tories. And given that you claim ( at times) to have abandoned the Tories in favour of more right wing alternatives, you might look at where those come, if they bother to put up candidates at all. Oh! I feel your pain. Soft spot was it? Yes! I don't do subtle and I am known for missing nuances and yesterday for 'entirely missing the point'. Yes. That is me. I grieve over it on the long winter nights. It comes with an absence of poetry, being so ill-read, having seen so few films, having no acquantaince with opera or fine music and knowing so very little about English or politics. I am rather deprived. You ought to feel sorry for me. Indeed I do. |
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
|
Post by The Bishop on Jun 23, 2023 10:52:29 GMT
Tavistock changes from May Ind ( obviously a different Indy) -7.6% LD -2.2% Green -1.7% Con +5.8% Lab - new Greens are up if you calculate using the other method, which backs up it being a decent effort from them. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam in Stroud on Jun 23, 2023 11:18:48 GMT
I am not sure whether we have rules in the prediction competition to cope with results decided by drawing lots? An interesting one for Robbie? Yes, indeed. I think I know what my own preferred 'fairest' solution would be, but not my place to try to influence the decision. I'm hoping that it involves drawing lots. |
|
