andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,665
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Nov 19, 2023 16:39:03 GMT
Westminster Voting Intention:
LAB: 41% (-3) CON: 29% (+1) LDM: 13% (+3) RFM: 7% (=) GRN: 5% (-2) SNP: 3% (=)
Via @moreincommon_, 15-17 Nov. Changes w/ 28 Oct - 2 Nov.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,067
|
Post by The Bishop on Nov 28, 2023 12:49:05 GMT
Labour lead back up to 16 points (44-28 I think) which seems around the recent norm for this pollster.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,665
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Dec 6, 2023 11:17:26 GMT
LAB: 41% (-3) CON: 29% (+1) LDM: 12% (+2) RFM: 8% (=) GRN: 6% (+1)
Via @moreincommon_, 1-4 Dec. Changes w/ 24-27 Nov.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,665
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Dec 14, 2023 18:23:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by london(ex)tory on Dec 14, 2023 21:35:23 GMT
That’s fine, that 20% can shut themselves away and leave the rest of us to get on with life.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,665
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Dec 15, 2023 13:58:30 GMT
Westminster Voting Intention:
LAB: 42% (+1) CON: 28% (-1) LDM: 11% (-1) RFM: 8% (=) GRN: 6% (=) SNP: 4% (+1)
Via @moreincommon_, 12-14 Dec. Changes w/ 30 Nov - 4 Dec.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,665
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Jan 11, 2024 23:45:53 GMT
Westminster Voting Intention:
LAB: 42% (=) CON: 27% (-1) LDM: 10% (-1) RFM: 9% (+1) GRN: 8% (+2) SNP: 3% (-1)
Via @moreincommon_, 9-11 Jan. Changes w/ 12-14 Dec.
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Feb 13, 2024 7:34:06 GMT
|
|
batman
Labour
Posts: 12,493
Member is Online
|
Post by batman on Feb 13, 2024 7:52:12 GMT
More In Common is an ironic name for a group so many of whose polls are outliers
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Feb 13, 2024 11:00:12 GMT
More In Common is an ironic name for a group so many of whose polls are outliers Possibly but we may find that Rochdale is the watershed and we now start to see the Labour lead trickle downward to the finish in another ocean from expectations thus far?
|
|
nodealbrexiteer
Forum Regular
non aligned favour no deal brexit!
Posts: 4,463
|
Post by nodealbrexiteer on Feb 13, 2024 11:37:46 GMT
More In Common is an ironic name for a group so many of whose polls are outliers Possibly but we may find that Rochdale is the watershed and we now start to see the Labour lead trickle downward to the finish in another ocean from expectations thus far? As long as enough holds to eject the govt!
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Feb 13, 2024 11:51:42 GMT
Possibly but we may find that Rochdale is the watershed and we now start to see the Labour lead trickle downward to the finish in another ocean from expectations thus far? As long as enough holds to eject the govt! Yes. I only comment. It is not a desire. A Conservative hold on a very small majority at the GE would be a nightmare result. We would be back to the dread May Administration where nothing was done and little attempted, but with a shell-shocked remnant exhausted and unfit. It is essential to have a Starmer Administration with a working majority. I hope it is not too large or it could have a suck in of utter dross MPs and a too triumphal approach. Look what happened to the Conservatives with that! The plates are shifting under our feet as we type. Brexit, Covid, botched Zero Carbon, Ukraine, Gaza, SNP implode and now Rochdale showing the vulnerable and nasty Muslim underbelly to Labour ..... These make for an insecurity that may go in any direction. We are in a sucked-breath turmoil of uncertainty and indecision. The herd may circle in sullen contempt, or it may make a breakout at speed that is quite outside our present comprehension.
|
|
nodealbrexiteer
Forum Regular
non aligned favour no deal brexit!
Posts: 4,463
|
Post by nodealbrexiteer on Feb 13, 2024 12:10:09 GMT
As long as enough holds to eject the govt! Yes. I only comment. It is not a desire. A Conservative hold on a very small majority at the GE would be a nightmare result. We would be back to the dread May Administration where nothing was done and little attempted, but with a shell-shocked remnant exhausted and unfit. It is essential to have a Starmer Administration with a working majority. I hope it is not too large or it could have a suck in of utter dross MPs and a too triumphal approach. Look what happened to the Conservatives with that! The plates are shifting under our feet as we type. Brexit, Covid, botched Zero Carbon, Ukraine, Gaza, SNP implode and now Rochdale showing the vulnerable and nasty Muslim underbelly to Labour ..... These make for an insecurity that may go in any direction. We are in a sucked-breath turmoil of uncertainty and indecision. The herd may cicle in sullen contempt, or it may make a breakout at speed that is quite outside our present comprehension. Or shades of 1992! Though looking back the 1992 reelected government seemed to be clearer in it's direction having followed on directly from the Thatcher period, it just got bogged down in lots of rubbish and then some! I can't see a large Labour majority given the gains needed, I'm still leaning to a minority government prediction(for now). A lot of new problems as you've list there.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,067
|
Post by The Bishop on Feb 13, 2024 12:11:52 GMT
I mean, many politically engaged types are utterly desperate to see Rochdale as this major turning point (see Jon Craig's literally totally insane piece this morning)
In the real world, most people are barely aware of it - and even fewer actually care. S*** happens.
|
|
jamie
Top Poster
Posts: 7,069
|
Post by jamie on Feb 13, 2024 19:38:48 GMT
I mean, many politically engaged types are utterly desperate to see Rochdale as this major turning point (see Jon Craig's literally totally insane piece this morning) In the real world, most people are barely aware of it - and even fewer actually care. S*** happens. And insofar as it could have had a long-term impact, it would be if Labour kept their candidate and allowed themselves to be branded by the Tories/media as still tolerant of anti-semitism. As we’ve seen over the past few months, Starmer’s hardline approach doesn’t seem to have done Labour’s polling any harm. If anything, it’s probably done Labour some good in the long term to get rid of quite a few single issue obsessives.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,318
|
Post by maxque on Feb 14, 2024 0:24:51 GMT
I mean, many politically engaged types are utterly desperate to see Rochdale as this major turning point (see Jon Craig's literally totally insane piece this morning) In the real world, most people are barely aware of it - and even fewer actually care. S*** happens. And insofar as it could have had a long-term impact, it would be if Labour kept their candidate and allowed themselves to be branded by the Tories/media as still tolerant of anti-semitism. As we’ve seen over the past few months, Starmer’s hardline approach doesn’t seem to have done Labour’s polling any harm. If anything, it’s probably done Labour some good in the long term to get rid of quite a few single issue obsessives. Too bad it's now swamped with the single-issue obsessives of the other persuation.
|
|
|
Post by mattbewilson on Feb 14, 2024 0:28:41 GMT
I mean, many politically engaged types are utterly desperate to see Rochdale as this major turning point (see Jon Craig's literally totally insane piece this morning) In the real world, most people are barely aware of it - and even fewer actually care. S*** happens. And insofar as it could have had a long-term impact, it would be if Labour kept their candidate and allowed themselves to be branded by the Tories/media as still tolerant of anti-semitism. As we’ve seen over the past few months, Starmer’s hardline approach doesn’t seem to have done Labour’s polling any harm. If anything, it’s probably done Labour some good in the long term to get rid of quite a few single issue obsessives. I am reminded of the Peterborough by election where Lisa Forbes wasn't disowned in that instance which was probably instrumental in Labour holding that seat but clearly not indicative of the result that December. This might mean defeat for labour on the 29th but the results on Thursday may be more important to the GE than the 29th
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Feb 28, 2024 8:11:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Mar 12, 2024 8:22:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Mar 21, 2024 19:11:38 GMT
|
|