Lords byelection

[johnloony]

Jan 30, 2013 18:17:45 GMT doktorb🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ said:

I like y criced

So? Nobody said you're not allowed to.
In that you are a Liberal Democrat, you are a peculiar minority anyway, so it doesn't particularly matter if you also have a bizarre and unnatural fetish for weird things like cricket.

[Davıd Boothroyd]

Result: Viscount Ridley elected.

Lead Viscount Hailsham by 14 to 10 on first preferences, 24 to 11 on the final count.

Shockingly Lord Sudeley did not get any votes.

www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-information-office/2013/Conservative-Hereditary-Peers-by-election-result-Earl-Ferrers.pdf

[Deleted]

Lord Sudeley woz robbed!

[casualobserver]

Feb 6, 2013 15:52:12 GMT Davıd Boothroyd said:

Result: Viscount Ridley elected.

Lead Viscount Hailsham by 14 to 10 on first preferences, 24 to 11 on the final count.

Shockingly Lord Sudeley did not get any votes.

www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-information-office/2013/Conservative-Hereditary-Peers-by-election-result-Earl-Ferrers.pdf

Very sloppy that the official result incorrectly shows that a vote was excluded as non-transferable after the fifth transfer. It's just a typo, wasn't carried forward to subsequent transfers, but is still very disappointing at this level of Government.