|
Post by andrewteale on Sept 6, 2019 21:33:40 GMT
Tameside 2019. Changes based on 2015: Grn gain from Lab Ashton Waterloo Lab gain from C Hyde Werneth Split wards are (not taking account of by-elections or defections): Ashton Waterloo is 2Lab/1Grn and Labour are defending in 2020. Hyde Werneth is 2C/1Lab and the Conservatives are defending in 2020.
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Sept 21, 2019 14:52:20 GMT
Chorley 2019. Changes based on 2015: Lab gain from C Astley and Buckshaw Chisnall Clayton-le-Woods and Whittle-le-Woods Clayton-le-Woods West and Cuerden Lostock Split wards are (not taking account of by-elections or defections): Chorley North West: 2Ind/1Lab (one of the independent seats is vacant) Clayton-le-Woods and Whittle-le-Woods: 2C/1Lab Euxton South: C/Lab Lostock: C/Lab Next year is all-up on new ward boundaries.
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Sept 26, 2019 13:03:48 GMT
Alasdair Rae's maps - Indices of Deprivation,2019:-
|
|
|
Post by bjornhattan on Sept 26, 2019 14:07:29 GMT
You can find an even better map at: dclgapps.communities.gov.uk/imd/iod_index.html, which is also interactive, and better shows the changes. However, the website is very slow and doesn't always load, it's probably fairly popular today. I'm not entirely convinced by the data though. The neighbourhood where I grew up (which has become ever more gentrified in the last few years) appears to have gone down over 1,000 places. I do wonder if there's been a change in the methodology which has affected some local authorities far more than others, because almost all of Gateshead has dropped (in some cases quite significantly, one area going from about 11,000th to under 8,000th). The only exception seems to be the areas by the river which have changed almost unimaginably (one LSOA going from 270 to 6100 in nine years).
|
|
|
Post by 🏴☠️ Neath West 🏴☠️ on Sept 26, 2019 14:24:58 GMT
Alasdair Rae's maps - Indices of Deprivation,2019:- Spot the boundary of Royal Sutton Coldfield Parish Council on that. :-)
|
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 13,501
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Sept 26, 2019 15:01:09 GMT
Alasdair Rae's maps - Indices of Deprivation,2019:- Shame, they look useful, if they hadn't crashed my computer when I followed the link. Before it went down I saw it struggling to fetch 300+ images of maps of EVERY SINGLE COUNCIL AREA.
|
|
|
Post by bjornhattan on Sept 26, 2019 18:00:50 GMT
This is a bit rough and ready, but I downloaded the deprivation data for 2015 and 2019, and made a quick comparison map between the two. Red areas have fallen in the rankings, green areas have risen, with lighter shades indicating areas where the change has been small, and yellow representing areas with no change at all. Obviously these are relative figures and not absolute figures, so for instance it might be the case deprivation in Northumberland has fallen, but other areas might have seen deprivation fall faster. There don't appear to be many clear trends. Almost all of London has done relatively well (though Bexley has seemingly moved the same way as the rest of Kent rather than London), whilst the North East and most of the North West appear to have done rather badly. The biggest ten changes in each direction are: Relatively Less Deprived1. Westminster (up 91 places - from 43rd to 134th) 2. Camden (up 64 places - from 68th to 132nd) 3. Redbridge (up 45 places - from 115th to 160th) 4. Brighton and Hove (up 34 places - from 106th to 140th) 5. Exeter (up 32 places - from 161st to 193rd) 5. Richmondshire (up 32 places - from 219th to 251st) 7. Barnet (up 31 places - from 153rd to 184th) 7. Wandsworth (up 31 places - from 142nd to 173rd) 9. Harlow (up 30 places - from 70th to 100th) 9. Waltham Forest (up 30 places - from 15th to 45th) Relatively More Deprived1. Tonbridge and Malling (down 33 places - from 269th to 236th) 2. Cherwell (down 29 places - from 249th to 220th) 3. Spelthorne (down 26 places - from 227th to 201st) 3. Wirral (down 26 places - from 103rd to 77th) 5. Preston (down 25 places - from 71st to 46th) 5. Gateshead (down 25 places - from 79th to 54th) 7. North Warwickshire (down 23 places - from 178th to 155th) 7. Arun (down 23 places - from 172nd to 149th) 7. Stockport (down 23 places - from 177th to 154th) 10. Dartford (down 22 places - from 167th to 145th) 10. Oldham (down 22 places - from 51st to 29th)
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Sept 26, 2019 19:14:05 GMT
You can find an even better map at: dclgapps.communities.gov.uk/imd/iod_index.html, which is also interactive, and better shows the changes. However, the website is very slow and doesn't always load, it's probably fairly popular today. I'm not entirely convinced by the data though. The neighbourhood where I grew up (which has become ever more gentrified in the last few years) appears to have gone down over 1,000 places. I do wonder if there's been a change in the methodology which has affected some local authorities far more than others, because almost all of Gateshead has dropped (in some cases quite significantly, one area going from about 11,000th to under 8,000th). The only exception seems to be the areas by the river which have changed almost unimaginably (one LSOA going from 270 to 6100 in nine years). Maybe it is just volume of traffic, but that map is very, very slow. Jaywick tops the list again, with places 2 through 9 apparently filled by Blackpool and Anfield 10th. I was going to list which parts of Blackpool, but that'll take all evening from that map.
|
|
|
Post by bjornhattan on Sept 26, 2019 19:34:46 GMT
You can find an even better map at: dclgapps.communities.gov.uk/imd/iod_index.html, which is also interactive, and better shows the changes. However, the website is very slow and doesn't always load, it's probably fairly popular today. I'm not entirely convinced by the data though. The neighbourhood where I grew up (which has become ever more gentrified in the last few years) appears to have gone down over 1,000 places. I do wonder if there's been a change in the methodology which has affected some local authorities far more than others, because almost all of Gateshead has dropped (in some cases quite significantly, one area going from about 11,000th to under 8,000th). The only exception seems to be the areas by the river which have changed almost unimaginably (one LSOA going from 270 to 6100 in nine years). Maybe it is just volume of traffic, but that map is very, very slow. Jaywick tops the list again, with places 2 through 9 apparently filled by Blackpool and Anfield 10th. I was going to list which parts of Blackpool, but that'll take all evening from that map. There's a couple of alternative sources I've found - 2nd to 9th are the following Blackpool LSOAs: 10A, 6A, 13B, 13A, 13D, 10E, 11A, and . In terms of wards (I don't really know Blackpool so these names might not mean much): 10A = north east Bloomfield 6A = seafront area in Claremont 13B = north west Bloomfield 13A = south west Bloomfield 13B = north Waterloo 10E = north east Talbot 11A = east Bloomfield (beyond Central Drive) = south east Claremont It looks like all of Bloomfield ward, barring the far south east of it (which is number 12), falls into the top 10. Since the rest of Jaywick's ward is relatively affluent (some even outside the top 10%), I would suspect Bloomfield is overall the most deprived ward in England. Edit: the weird emoji thing is what the forum software interprets "Eight D" as.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 26, 2019 19:44:24 GMT
My own LSOA has dropped more than 2,000 places and out of the 10% least deprived
|
|
|
Post by alexrichards on Sept 26, 2019 22:49:10 GMT
I've finally finished reconstructing the 1981 Craven parish reorganisation order (I suspect I may have missed a couple of minor changes) so here's the progress so far on the 1974 Parish map.
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Sept 26, 2019 23:17:28 GMT
I've finally finished reconstructing the 1981 Craven parish reorganisation order (I suspect I may have missed a couple of minor changes) so here's the progress so far on the 1974 Parish map. The image isn't loading for me?
|
|
|
Post by alexrichards on Sept 26, 2019 23:23:33 GMT
|
|
yorkshireluke
Lib Dem
I run @polmapsinfoUK, @YorkshireElects and /r/PoliticalMaps/
Posts: 746
|
Post by yorkshireluke on Sept 27, 2019 0:14:40 GMT
Historic Lancashire as it is today:
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Sept 27, 2019 16:44:03 GMT
Historic Lancashire as it is today: Great map. Trinity ward in Burnley should be Green though?
|
|
|
Post by David Ashforth on Sept 28, 2019 9:52:34 GMT
|
|
yorkshireluke
Lib Dem
I run @polmapsinfoUK, @YorkshireElects and /r/PoliticalMaps/
Posts: 746
|
Post by yorkshireluke on Sept 28, 2019 14:49:15 GMT
Historic Lancashire as it is today: Great map. Trinity ward in Burnley should be Green though? Yeah not sure how I missed that to be honest. I've fixed it so any future release will have it fixed.
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Sept 28, 2019 20:51:30 GMT
Daventry 2018. Changes based on 2014: Lab gain from UKIP Abbey North Drayton The 2019 Daventry elections were postponed to 2020. There is a suggestion that the 2020 elections in Daventry will themselves be cancelled and replaced by a shadow election for a new West Northamptonshire council, however no legislation to this effect has yet been published. So the legal position currently is that there will be an election for two-thirds of Daventry council in May 2020. On this basis split wards are (not taking account of by-elections or defections): Abbey North is 2Lab/1C and the Conservatives and Labour will defend one seat each in 2020. Barby and Kilsby is C/LD and both seats are up for election in 2020. Drayton is 2Lab/1C and the Conservatives and Labour will defend one seat each in 2020. The Liberal Democrats have gained one of the three Brixworth seats in a by-election. That by-election gain will be up in 2020 along with one of the remaining Conservative seats.
|
|
|
Post by David Ashforth on Oct 4, 2019 8:39:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Oct 4, 2019 22:26:26 GMT
|
|